<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Security Cadets &#187; Enigma</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.securitycadets.com/category/enigma/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.securitycadets.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2010 10:23:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Enigma Software Group Name Change?</title>
		<link>http://www.securitycadets.com/2008/05/enigma-software-group-name-change/</link>
		<comments>http://www.securitycadets.com/2008/05/enigma-software-group-name-change/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 18:46:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>AndyAtHull</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Enigma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.securitycadets.com/?p=600</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was bound to write about these guys again and in a sense I am glad I am! It appears that Enigma Software Group want to change name from Enigma Software Group Inc to City Loan Inc. Pretty damn odd for a company like that to change into something different (or at least their name). [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was bound to write about these guys again and in a sense I am glad I am! It appears that Enigma Software Group want to change name from <strong>Enigma Software Group Inc</strong> to <strong>City Loan Inc</strong>.</p>
<p>Pretty damn odd for a company like that to change into something different (or at least their name). What&#8217;s even more funny is <a href="http://certifiedbug.com/blog/2008/05/21/enigmasoftware-payday-loan/" target="_blank">this</a> article by our friends at <a href="http://certifiedbug.com/" target="_blank">CertifiedBug.Org</a>:</p>
<p style="text-align: left; padding-left: 30px;"><em>&#8220;Scan your entire computer to detect negative credit&#8221;.</em></p>
<p style="text-align: left;">PaperGhost also blogs about this <a href="http://www.vitalsecurity.org/2008/05/scan-your-entire-computer-to-detectwait.html" target="_blank">here</a>.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">I have so many thoughts on this that I would just explode and keep on doing so. However due to commitments elsewhere and that fact each sentence I write is analyzed by Enigma&#8217;s lawyer&#8217;s, I&#8217;ll save this opinion of mine for a rainy day. However if you have one, <a href="http://forum.securitycadets.com/index.php?showtopic=6830" target="_blank">tell us here</a>!</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><strong>Previous Articles About Enigma:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.securitycadets.com/2007/08/here-goes-another-rant-about-enigma/" target="_blank">Here goes &#8230; Another rant about Enigma</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.securitycadets.com/2007/07/spyhunter-the-return-leg-coming-soon/" target="_blank"> SpyHunter the return leg … coming soon!</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.securitycadets.com/2007/05/one-issue-fixed-on-to-the-next/" target="_blank"> One issue fixed, on to the next..</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.securitycadets.com/2007/05/enigmas-status-a-week-on/" target="_blank"> Enigma’s (ESG) status a week on..</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.securitycadets.com/2007/04/enigma-411-spywarecom-update/" target="_blank"> Enigma &amp; 411-spyware.com Update</a></li>
<li> <a href="http://www.securitycadets.com/2007/04/411-spywarecom-the-new-forum-spammers/" target="_blank">411-spyware.com &#8211; The new forum spammers?</a></li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.securitycadets.com/2008/05/enigma-software-group-name-change/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Here goes &#8230; Another rant about Enigma.</title>
		<link>http://www.securitycadets.com/2007/08/here-goes-another-rant-about-enigma/</link>
		<comments>http://www.securitycadets.com/2007/08/here-goes-another-rant-about-enigma/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 15:43:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>AndyAtHull</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Enigma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.securitycadets.com/2007/08/here-goes-another-rant-about-enigma/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ever since I started in the &#8216;security area&#8216; I have come across many people, companies and individuals. Some are an outstanding asset to this industry. Others just need a kick up the ass and set straight. And the bad need to be taken away from the internet full stop. When I first started reporting about [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ever since I started in the &#8216;<em>security area</em>&#8216; I have come across many people, companies and individuals. Some are an outstanding asset to this industry. Others just need a kick up the ass and set straight. And the bad need to be taken away from the internet full stop.</p>
<p>When I first started reporting about spammers on security forums, which involved Enigma Software Group at the time, I never imagined they would react as they did. We all know about the discussions <a href="http://www.spywarewarrior.com/viewtopic.php?t=24810" target="_blank">at SpywareWarrior</a> and what <a href="http://www.securitycadets.com/2007/05/enigmas-status-a-week-on/" target="_blank">I managed to set straight</a> when it came to their affiliates. And from that point we got something done about their ethics and affiliate practices. Basically <em>some good</em> managed to come from it.</p>
<p>&#8230; however what I find strange is accusing this site and others who they classed as direct &#8220;<em>competitors</em>&#8221; and then months later use these sites as a reference on malware.</p>
<p align="center"><a href="http://www.securitycadets.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/08/enternung1.gif" title="Enigma’s Affiliate" border="0"><img src="http://www.securitycadets.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/08/enternung1.thumbnail.gif" alt="Enigma’s Affiliate" border="0" /></a><br />
(Click to Enlarge)
</p>
<p align="left">This was taken a week or so ago. In fact it&#8217;s still <a href="http://209.85.135.104/search?q=cache:LCfqHPEVibwJ:www.entfernen-spyware.de/spycrush-entfernen.html+securitycadets&amp;hl=en&amp;ct=clnk&amp;cd=128&amp;gl=uk&amp;client=firefox-a" target="_blank">the same today</a>. So you&#8217;re probably thinking what my point is. Well it&#8217;s simple &#8230;</p>
<p align="left">I don&#8217;t want to act as a reference point by a company who months before accused us of being some big competitor. <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Have_one's_cake_and_eat_it_too" target="_blank">You can&#8217;t have ones cake and eat it</a>.</p>
<p align="left">Fine, argue your point about spamming on forums and your ethics, but don&#8217;t try and benefit from it by linking back to this site, the site you accused.</p>
<p align="left">I did do something about it, I mailed the CEO of Enigma twice in as many months. So far no response. So this article is basically my next step as this cannot happen.</p>
<p align="left">The above example in the image is also for <a href="http://www.securitycadets.com/2006/10/new-rogue-making-its-mark-pestcapture/" target="_blank">Pest Capture</a> and others. Ironically what has happened since I mailed the CEO is that the front page of this affiliate has changed somewhat. It has small description paragraphs of malware and a direct link to ESG&#8217;s software. However the pages are still in the search engines, although not directly linked in the home page.</p>
<p align="left">&#8230;Final words, Enigma still need to look at how their affiliates work, how they work as a company and realise you cannot one week accuse certain communities and then happily use those communities as a positive way in order to benefit.</p>
<p align="left">We also request all links to this site from any Enigma sites and affiliate sites to be removed.</p>
<p align="left"><strong>Update</strong> &#8211; Our links have now been removed from the raised afiliate site in this article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.securitycadets.com/2007/08/here-goes-another-rant-about-enigma/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SpyHunter the return leg &#8230; coming soon!</title>
		<link>http://www.securitycadets.com/2007/07/spyhunter-the-return-leg-coming-soon/</link>
		<comments>http://www.securitycadets.com/2007/07/spyhunter-the-return-leg-coming-soon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jul 2007 22:41:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>AndyAtHull</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Enigma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.securitycadets.com/2007/07/spyhunter-the-return-leg-coming-soon/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I hate to say this, but in a day or so I will be hopefully posting about SpyHunter and the affiliates again! We all know about their status and what they did after I started to kick up a fuss. Yes, they followed my advice and changed all their affiliate pages to a somewhat suitable [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hate to say this, but in a day or so I will be hopefully posting about SpyHunter and the affiliates again!</p>
<p>We all know about <a href="http://www.securitycadets.com/2007/05/enigmas-status-a-week-on/" target="_blank">their status</a> and what they did after I started to kick up a fuss. Yes, they followed my advice and changed all their affiliate pages to a somewhat suitable standard &#8230;</p>
<p>&#8230; , but &#8230;</p>
<p>&#8230; what I discovered is still unacceptable. Stay tuned &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.securitycadets.com/2007/07/spyhunter-the-return-leg-coming-soon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>One issue fixed, on to the next..</title>
		<link>http://www.securitycadets.com/2007/05/one-issue-fixed-on-to-the-next/</link>
		<comments>http://www.securitycadets.com/2007/05/one-issue-fixed-on-to-the-next/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2007 18:06:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>AndyAtHull</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Enigma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.securitycadets.com/2007/05/one-issue-fixed-on-to-the-next/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A few days ago I blogged about some of Enigma&#8217;s affiliate sites that still needed cleaning up. Well a few days later it looks like the issues I brought to light have been changed to the way we suggested in discussions awhile ago. This is one issue fixed, and on to the next, for Enigma. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A few days ago I blogged about some of Enigma&#8217;s affiliate sites that <a href="http://www.securitycadets.com/2007/05/enigmas-status-a-week-on/">still needed cleaning up</a>.</p>
<p>Well a few days later it looks like the issues I brought to light have been changed to the way we suggested in <a href="http://www.spywarewarrior.com/viewtopic.php?t=24810" target="_blank">discussions</a> awhile ago.</p>
<p>This is one issue fixed, and on to the next, for Enigma. I hope they continue to monitor their affiliates and take the correct steps if things go wrong.</p>
<p>We will always be watching and making sure the consumer gets a fair deal!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.securitycadets.com/2007/05/one-issue-fixed-on-to-the-next/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Enigma&#8217;s (ESG) status a week on..</title>
		<link>http://www.securitycadets.com/2007/05/enigmas-status-a-week-on/</link>
		<comments>http://www.securitycadets.com/2007/05/enigmas-status-a-week-on/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 17:18:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>AndyAtHull</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Enigma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.securitycadets.com/2007/05/status-with-esg-and-the-security-community-a-week-on/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This will be an interesting post for some and not so interesting for others. Let&#8217;s me make this clear before you read on &#8211; This post is my work and my opinion only. &#8230;&#8230;Now that is over with, let&#8217;s begin. It&#8217;s been one week since discussions between the security community and the CEO of Enigma [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This will be an interesting post for some and not so interesting for others. Let&#8217;s me make this clear before you read on &#8211; This post is <strong>my</strong> work and <strong>my</strong> opinion only.</p>
<p>&#8230;&#8230;Now that is over with, let&#8217;s begin.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s been one week since <a href="http://www.spywarewarrior.com/viewtopic.php?t=24810" target="_blank">discussions between the security community and the CEO of Enigma Software Group</a> ended. With that in mind and the suggestions put forward by the community (<em>and partly accepted by ESG</em>) I thought I would visit those sites. The sites that at first got used to spam on forums, and second never clearly stated on their sites that the tool they recommeded was <em>SpyHunter</em> which you had to pay for in order to remove anything it found.</p>
<p>Many sites got flown about into the mix. Some owned by <em>ESG</em> and others by their affiliates. And some being accused for negative speech like this site. So what feedback did <em>ESG</em> walk away with? What suggestions did they promise to follow?</p>
<blockquote><p><em><span class="postbody">&#8220;I agree with you&#8230;.. it should be. Scanner-only-tool. And a disclosure that the tool only scan.&#8221;</span></em></p></blockquote>
<p>As you will see in the post as we go along, this hasen&#8217;t happened a week on.</p>
<blockquote><p><em><span class="postbody">&#8220;&#8230;..Enigma will comply wih the complaints and recomendations of the Internet Security Community and SpywareWarrior forum&#8230;&#8221;</span></em></p></blockquote>
<p>These are just a few. I could go on and on if I quoted each and every promise &amp; suggestion, but you get the idea. Besides you can always <a href="http://www.spywarewarrior.com/viewtopic.php?t=24810" target="_blank">read everything at SpywareWarrior</a> and make your own mind up.</p>
<p>So, what are the sites in question?:</p>
<ul>
<li>411-spyware-remove.com</li>
<li> 411-spyware.com</li>
<li> spywareremove.com</li>
<li> against-spyware.com</li>
<li> anti-spyware-101.com</li>
<li> spyware-escape.com</li>
<li> spywarelocked.org</li>
<li> xp-vista.com</li>
<li> softvote.com</li>
<li> 2-freespywareremoval.com</li>
<li> uninstall-spyware.com</li>
<li> uninstall-i-lookup.com</li>
</ul>
<p>If I have left some out then I apologize. Some have cleaned up, but others haven&#8217;t as a week has passed.</p>
<p><strong><u>411-spyware-remove.com:</u></strong></p>
<p align="center"><a href="http://www.securitycadets.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/05/1.gif" title="411-spyware-remove.com" border="0"><img src="http://www.securitycadets.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/05/1.thumbnail.gif" alt="411-spyware-remove.com" border="0" /></a><br />
(Click to Enlarge)
</p>
<p align="left">As you can see from the parts highlighted. This site clearly needs some work. Not about the naming of the tool on the site, but by stating it is an <em>Automatic Spyware Removal Tool</em> when infact it only becomes a removal too when you pay for it.</p>
<p align="left"><strong><u>spywareremove.com:</u></strong></p>
<p align="center"> <a href="http://www.securitycadets.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/05/2.gif" title="spywareremove.com" border="0"><img src="http://www.securitycadets.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/05/2.thumbnail.gif" alt="spywareremove.com" border="0" /></a><br />
(Click to Enlarge)
</p>
<p align="left">The name of the .exe file does state it is <em>SpyHunter</em> however what is highlighted clearly doesn&#8217;t state it is a free scanner.</p>
<p align="left"><strong><u>against-spyware.com:</u></strong></p>
<p align="center"> <a href="http://www.securitycadets.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/05/3.gif" title="againts-spyware.com" border="0"><img src="http://www.securitycadets.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/05/3.thumbnail.gif" alt="againts-spyware.com" border="0" /></a><br />
(Click to Enlarge)
</p>
<p align="left">Although the name of the .exe doesn&#8217;t indicate it&#8217;s <em>SpyHunter</em>, the highlighted part does. However it doesn&#8217;t state it is a free scanner, but clearly states it is a tool to <em>remove Zlob and other spyware</em>.</p>
<p align="left"><strong><u>spywarelocked.org:</u></strong></p>
<p align="center"> <a href="http://www.securitycadets.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/05/4.gif" title="spywarelocked.org" border="0"><img src="http://www.securitycadets.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/05/4.thumbnail.gif" alt="spywarelocked.org" border="0" /></a><br />
(Click to Enlarge)
</p>
<p align="left">Now this one is something that probably defines my arguement. Look at the highlighted and underscore parts:</p>
<ol>
<li><em>Download SpywareLocked Removel Tool</em></li>
<li><em>Run a scan to detect and remove any SpywareLocked threats</em></li>
<li><em> Delete any values found by SpywareLocked scanner</em></li>
</ol>
<p align="left">&#8230; And the name of the .exe is wrong as-well. So, make your own mind up.</p>
<p align="left"><strong><u>2-freespywareremoval.com:</u></strong></p>
<p align="center"> <a href="http://www.securitycadets.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/05/5.gif" title="2-freespywareremoval.com" border="0"><img src="http://www.securitycadets.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/05/5.thumbnail.gif" alt="2-freespywareremoval.com" border="0" /></a><br />
(Click to Enlarge)
</p>
<p align="left"> This site even states the tool is an <em>Automatic Removal</em>. Plus the .exe is totally different to the name spyhunter.exe for example. And can you see the date? March the 20th. Seven days before discussions began and now ten days after they ended, not changed.</p>
<p align="left"><strong><u>uninstall-spyware.com:</u></strong></p>
<p align="center"> <a href="http://www.securitycadets.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/05/6.gif" title="uninstall-spyware.com" border="0"><img src="http://www.securitycadets.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/05/6.thumbnail.gif" alt="uninstall-spyware.com" border="0" /></a><br />
(Click to Enlarge)
</p>
<p align="left">As you can see from the image it is a bit like <em>spywarelocked.org</em>. But worded slightly different on some areas. The other part to take note is the <strong>Tip</strong> part;</p>
<blockquote>
<p align="left"><em> &#8220;<strong>Tip:</strong> If you are not an expert in this field, we highly recommend you use  the <strong>SpywareStrike automatic removal process</strong>.  You&#8217;ll run the risk of destroying your computer if you make a mistake during the  manual removal process.&#8221;</em></p>
</blockquote>
<p>The bold area is a direct link to the renamed tool that now states it is an <em>automatic removal process</em>. The tool you have to pay for remember, when you want to remove anything found.</p>
<p><strong><u>uninstall-i-lookup.com:</u></strong></p>
<p align="center"><a href="http://www.securitycadets.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/05/7.gif" title="uninstall-i]lookup.com" border="0"><img src="http://www.securitycadets.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/05/7.thumbnail.gif" alt="uninstall-i]lookup.com" border="0" /></a><br />
(Click to Enlarge)
</p>
<p align="left">This one is the same as the previous site I mentioned only a different URL and different malware. I didn&#8217;t want you to think I was picking on <a href="http://www.securitycadets.com/2007/03/spylocked-the-latest-rogue/" target="_blank">SpyLocked</a> all the time. And as you can see from the image things still need correcting.</p>
<p align="left">Which sites managed to act?;</p>
<ul>
<li>411-spyware.com</li>
<li>anti-spyware-101.com</li>
<li>spyware-escape.com</li>
<li>xp-vista.com</li>
</ul>
<p>&#8230; As far as I know. BUT that is not good enough. I&#8217;m sorry, it just clearly isn&#8217;t! Two or three days after the discussions that took place maybe. But not a full week.</p>
<p>I would like to point out is that this article is not about the spamming on forums we<a href="http://www.securitycadets.com/2007/04/enigma-411-spywarecom-update/" target="_blank"> saw awhile back</a> but about sites that are either affiliates or owned by <em>ESG</em>.</p>
<p>What if <em>Joe Average</em> goes to these sites and needs a quick fix to remove malware. Then after reading one of the sites above gets excited as one stated it&#8217;s an <em>automatic removal tool/process</em>. Ends up being disappointed because <strong>1)</strong> he still has the malware after a scan <strong>2)</strong> needs to fork out x amount to remove it when he may already have spent x amount by the rogue he was infected with in the first place. Wrong, wrong and WRONG!  Regardless of any future plans for a trial.</p>
<p><strong>My conclusion</strong>; clean those sites up! It is that simple. Then tackle the next issue.</p>
<ul>
<li>Changing a link; two minutes, if that.</li>
<li>Changing the name of an .exe; not even a minute.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>End result</strong>; better (<em>not grea</em>t) practices and ethics.</p>
<p>On a different note <em>ESG</em> did release a new <a href="http://www.pr-inside.com/symantec-responds-to-enigma-software-group-s-r112606.htm" target="_blank">press release</a> informing their status about <em>Symantec</em> but also about our discussions:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>&#8220;Recently, Enigma has engaged the Internet Security Community in an open discussion that included group of several smaller competitors. The discussions were positive, and many people, especially Eric Howes, offered constructive suggestions. As a result, Enigma will make some changes to their marketing, such as: offering a fully functioning free trial of SpyHunter 3.0, and stricter enforcement of rules of Affiliate Program.&#8221;</em></p></blockquote>
<p>As much as I appriciate <em>ESG</em> cleaning up some sites, I still believe they have a lot of work to do and hope they clean up the sites I mentioned in this post. This is not to bad mouth <em>ESG</em> or to accuse them but to help the computer users who need quality help at the end of the day.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d like to point out that anyone reading this with malware trouble is welcome to get free help in removing the malware/adware/spyware by getting advice from our malware hunters in our <a href="http://forum.securitycadets.com/index.php?showforum=2" target="_blank">dedicated forum</a>. You can also chat about this <a href="http://forum.securitycadets.com/index.php?showtopic=2628" target="_blank">here if you wish</a> in our public forum.</p>
<p style="font-style: italic">*The content of this post is the opinion of the author and no one else&#8217;s. The author welcomes constructive feedback but reserves the right to remove any comments posted*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.securitycadets.com/2007/05/enigmas-status-a-week-on/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Enigma &amp; 411-spyware.com Update</title>
		<link>http://www.securitycadets.com/2007/04/enigma-411-spywarecom-update/</link>
		<comments>http://www.securitycadets.com/2007/04/enigma-411-spywarecom-update/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 20:18:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>AndyAtHull</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Enigma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spam]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.securitycadets.com/2007/04/enigma-411-spywarecom-update/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you are a regular reader of this blog you may remember my take on forum spammers relating to Enigma. Well they have now released their own say on it: Enigma&#8217;s Press Release Update &#8211; 28th of April 2007; &#8211; Discussions have taken place at SpywareWarrior which included many helpers of this community. You can [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you are a regular reader of this blog you may remember <a href="http://www.securitycadets.com/2007/04/411-spywarecom-the-new-forum-spammers/" target="_blank">my take on forum spammers relating to Enigma</a>. Well they have now released their own say on it:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.earthtimes.org/articles/show/news_press_release,95481.shtml" target="_blank">Enigma&#8217;s Press Release</a></p>
<p><em><strong>Update &#8211; 28th of April 2007;</strong></em> &#8211; <em>Discussions have taken place at SpywareWarrior which included many helpers of this community. You can go read and make your own opinion and mind as to what you think &#8211; <a href="http://www.spywarewarrior.com/viewtopic.php?t=24810" target="_blank">HERE</a>.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.securitycadets.com/2007/04/enigma-411-spywarecom-update/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>411-spyware.com &#8211; The new forum spammers?</title>
		<link>http://www.securitycadets.com/2007/04/411-spywarecom-the-new-forum-spammers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.securitycadets.com/2007/04/411-spywarecom-the-new-forum-spammers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2007 00:19:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>AndyAtHull</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Enigma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spam]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.securitycadets.com/2007/04/411-spywarecom-the-new-forum-spammers/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It appears to be and to be very annoying that 411-spyware.com or gangs are spamming forums! It hasn&#8217;t just affected us but other known forums on the net. The spammers tend to push a program that is claiming to remove the latest rogues like SpyLocked/SpywareLocked/SpyLocker but infact it&#8217;s a program called SpyHunter. &#8230;&#8230;.hears the penny/cent [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It appears to be and to be very annoying that 411-spyware.com or gangs are spamming forums!</p>
<p>It hasn&#8217;t just affected us but other known forums on the net. The <em>spammers</em> tend to push a program that is claiming to remove the latest rogues like <a href="http://www.securitycadets.com/2007/03/spylocked-the-latest-rogue/" target="_blank">SpyLocked/SpywareLocked/SpyLocker</a> but infact it&#8217;s a program called SpyHunter.</p>
<p>&#8230;&#8230;.hears the penny/cent drop.</p>
<p>Yes the company that pushes <strong>SpyHunter</strong> is <em>Enigma Software Group</em>. The one that use to be on the bad <a href="http://www.spywarewarrior.com/rogue_anti-spyware.htm#sh_note" target="_blank">Rogue/Suspect Anti-Spyware Products &amp; Web Sites</a> list for this reason:</p>
<p>&#8220;&#8230;<em>Enigma&#8217;s SpyHunter anti-spyware application was listed on this page primarily because of the company&#8217;s history of employing aggressive, deceptive advertising</em>&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>They hide their installer as a tool that claims to remove rogues then when you download the recommended tool from the said site you get the SpyHunter installer. If you ask me in light of this. They should be re-listed on the list above.</p>
<p>They go on your forum (<em>or public service boards</em>) and have a few different tactics to <em>try</em> and make it look like they are legit users. Or just spam links to whatever rogue is on at the time.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.securitycadets.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/04/411spam.PNG" title="411-spyware.com spammers" border="0"></a></p>
<p style="text-align: center"><a href="http://www.securitycadets.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/04/411spam.PNG" title="411-spyware.com spammers" border="0"><img src="http://www.securitycadets.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/04/411spam.thumbnail.PNG" alt="411-spyware.com spammers" border="0" /></a></p>
<p align="center"><a href="http://www.securitycadets.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/04/411spam.PNG" title="411-spyware.com spammers" border="0"></a>(Click to Enlarge)</p>
<p>If you are part of the spamming gang, do yourself a favour and stop your posts on each and every forum and public service like yahoo. It doesn&#8217;t do you any favours and more importantly the computer users. Especially now people like me blog about it. But feel free to <a href="http://www.securitycadets.com/contact-ys/" target="_blank">contact me</a>!</p>
<p>If you are a forum owner and wish to discuss this then you can do so in a few ways. Reply with a comment to this article or <a href="http://forum.securitycadets.com/index.php?showtopic=2314" target="_blank">discuss it on our forum</a>. Computer users with any infection should avoid 411-spyware.com and seek advice from helpers here or at <a href="http://www.securitycadets.com/asap/" target="_blank">ASAP</a> sites.  Oh and <a href="http://digg.com/security/411_spyware_com_The_new_forum_spammers/" target="_blank">Digg it here</a>!</p>
<p>More coverage: <a href="http://temerc.blogspot.com/2007/04/spyware-help-intent-matters-alotpart-2.html" target="_blank">Malware Advisor</a></p>
<p><strong>Update 26th of April 2007</strong>, more coverage inlight of <a href="http://www.earthtimes.org/articles/show/news_press_release,95481.shtml" target="_blank">Enigma&#8217;s press release here</a> visit <a href="http://www.vitalsecurity.org/2007/04/im-on-it-get-on-it-troops-are-on-fire.html" target="_blank">VitalSecurity</a>. More coverage: <a href="http://mysteryfcm.co.uk/?mode=Articles&amp;date=26-04-2007" target="_blank">Ur I.T. Mate Group</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.securitycadets.com/2007/04/411-spywarecom-the-new-forum-spammers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
